A Man for All Seasons: Play About Thomas More Essay

A Man for All Seasons pen by Robert Bolt is a run for close a man, Thomas much, who lives by his beliefs and eventually dies because of his beliefs. The lam has a simple theme, played out through a few main characters. sizeables character and personality prevent more(prenominal) from being successful. The premier appearance of sizable in the play happens right out in the first snap. This is the first time you get to see his personality. Rich and much have an argument, as to whether every man is capable of being bribed.Rich believes that m bingley, status or women, back bribe anyone. more doesnt agree with him completely but is intrigued with his belief that a man toilet be bought with materials. Rich is referring to the fact that he has read Machiavelli, which more later teases him of. Machiavellis morals argon different from more thans. More admires his private conscience above things like personal advancement, but Machiavelli gives advice about the opposite. Richs reference to Machiavelli seems to show that he and Thomas Cromwell will spare no one to achieve success later in the play.At the end of the scene More tells the duke that Rich needfully a job, but that he doesnt necessarily recommend Rich, which displays Mores view of Rich. More is a well respected man, so his opinion on someone would be a effectual one. Right from the beginning of the play you flush toilet see the difference between Richs and Mores characters. More obviously cares for Richs well being. Richs lust for index number and wealth in the end gets the best of him and any kind of guidance or advice presumptuousness from More is ignored. Its interesting to note that More does care for Rich.In his interaction with Rich in the first scene, More teaches by testing Rich by offering him the chalice, letting Rich know that the goblet was a bribe and is therefore ? dirtied. More understands Richs faults from the beginning of the play, but he tries to farm Rich anyway. This is another excellent example of Mores superior character. Its unfortunate that Rich eventually perjures himself to sentence More to death. A Man for All Seasons focuses on Richs machinate in status almost as much as it does the fall of More.More and his beliefs get him death, term Rich gains greater status and more and more wealth, at the cost of his friend More. Throughout the nurse you can see Rich fall deeper and deeper into his own loss of innocence. At the end of Act One, Rich and Cromwell are having a conversation. Cromwell offers Rich the job as Collector of Revenue in return he wants information about the goblet given to him by More. Rich ? laments that he has lost his innocence, Im Lamenting. Ive lost my innocence (44). The scene seems to show that Rich has sold his soul to the Devil. In this scene Rich isnt entirely sure about what he is doing which shows that at this point there is lighten some humanity left in him. The final fall of Richs character occurs at the end of the play when Rich takes the stand at Mores trial. Rich is asked to testify about his conversation with More before the trial on what Mores stance was on what the King was doing. Rich says, sevens has made our King Head of the Church. Why will you not accept him?Then he verbalise parliament had no power to do it (94). By perjuring against More he has pulled the final straw and officially hands himself over to greed and lust for power. Mores standout character is shown once again when he says to Rich, In good faith, Rich, I am sorrier for your perjury than my peril. In the end for perjuring against More Rich is given the job of attorney General of Wales. Throughout the play we see the fall of Thomas More and the salary increase of Rich. The contrast of Richs gain in status and Mores loss of status, really makes the play.It seems that the author doesnt try to make his characters stand for anyone thing in particular, but in Richs carapace he is a symbol of the tendency to surre nder to the temptation of wealth and status. Throughout the play you never get any real depth of Rich as a person. This seems to be what the author is toilsome to do because Rich works as a perfect contrast to More without taking anything away from Mores character. Without the contrast of Richs character we wouldnt get to see who More really is. Richs character shows us all what impact money and status can have on us.